Rebel_Rider1969
Well Known Nuisance
Yeah, his dance card will be full.From the basement to the Big House. Hope homie can wap well wiff his front teef missing... bc I see this in his near future.
The New Classified Ad System is live. Please head here for details: https://gulfcoastgunforum.com/threads/new-classified-ad-system-tutorial.112735/
Yeah, his dance card will be full.From the basement to the Big House. Hope homie can wap well wiff his front teef missing... bc I see this in his near future.
Yep, with all the screeching about 2a most forget that it's a everyone law. No mention of felons, etc... EVERYONE GETS A GUN IF THEY CHOSE TO HAVE ONE.For the Record Private Sales in Illinois are legal under the following conditions:
The Right Way for Private Citizens to Sell Firearms in Illinois
Illinois has strict and often confusing laws surrounding the rights of private citizens to sell firearms in the state. If you are interested in selling firearms as a private citizen, it is essential that you fully understand what these rights and limitations are. Failure to understand these...www.chicagocriminallawyer.comHow Can Illinois’ Private Citizens Legally Sell a Firearm?
If you plan on selling guns as a private citizen, you must first make sure that the buyer meets certain requirements.
All buyers in the state must be at least 18 years of age in order to purchase rifles, shotguns, or ammunition for these types of firearms. For handguns and handgun ammunition, all potential buyers must be at least 21 years of age or older.
It is a requirement for a buyer to have a valid FOIC card. Before you are allowed to transfer the firearm to the buyer, you must first contact the Department of State Police with the FOIC card number to check if the sale or transfer is legal.
If the Department of State Police approves the sale, they will issue you with an approval number. This number will be valid for a period of thirty days after it is issued.
There are limitations other than age on who you can sell a firearm. Individuals restricted from owning a firearm include:
- Persons with mental impairment
- Those who have ever been a patient at a mental institution
- Individuals who are deemed to be intellectually or developmentally disabled
- Those who have used or been addicted to illicit substances within a year of applying
- People who are the subject of an existing Order of Protection
- Persons who have ever been convicted of domestic battery
- Parties who are unlawfully present in the United States
- Individuals that have failed a drug test within a year prior to the application for a medication they were not prescribed
- People in the United States of America on a non-immigrant class visa
- Anyone who has renounced their United States citizenship
- Former military who were dishonorably discharged from the U.S. Armed Services
- Any fugitive from justice
It looks like other than the FOIC the process and requirements for a private sale in Illinois is no different than in Florida or any other free state.For the record, I wouldn't sell this dude a gun either. But knowing it was Illinois, where private sales are illegal, I did not think we were talking about that.
Sent from my SM-G981V using Tapatalk
Is it possible to be "any fugitive from justice" and not be a felon? Perhaps a person of interest which by definition is a possible or probable future felon. A definition without a distinction. IMOYep, with all the screeching about 2a most forget that it's a everyone law. No mention of felons, etc... EVERYONE GETS A GUN IF THEY CHOSE TO HAVE ONE.
Is it possible to be "any fugitive from justice" and not be a felon? Perhaps a person of interest which by definition is a possible or probable future felon. A definition without a distinction. IMO
Sorry, I took longer to get to your final point. When its possible that someone is infringing on my, our God Given Right to self protection, I err on the side of caution. Indirectly, each time an occasion regarding fire arms hits the drive by media my, our 2A rights are put in jeopardy. As I said earlier if something or someone is not passing the sniff test its game over. With crimo III, with ramos, with haynes, with cruz, there were warning signs ignored. I do profile. I practice situational awareness ad nuaseam. I think its foolish not to. Its that little quiet voice in your head that everyone has but is ignored by some at their own peril. I think most people know right from wrong.Just wondering what point you're trying to make.
Sent from my SM-G981V using Tapatalk
It's almost like he should have been red flaggedHighland Park July 4 shooting suspect had two prior incidents of suicidal, violent threats, police say
Surprise, Surprise. So this information is now made available. This tragedy could have been averted if only someone had performed the job they were being paid to do. What a shock. This information can be traced to a responsible individual. Will it be? If not, why not? This is not new. This is what happens when crazys are locked down and masked up under the guise of a pandemic. This scenario is all too familiar.
Speaking to reporters at an afternoon press conference, Christopher Covelli said Crimo had two prior incidents before the shooting.
In April 2019, an individual called police a week after learning of Crimo attempting suicide, Covelli said. The matter was handled by mental health professionals with no law enforcement, he added.
HIGHLAND PARK JULY 4TH SHOOTING SUSPECT’S PARENTS WERE ‘A PROBLEM,’ SAYS FORMER COACH
In September 2019, a family member reported Crimo had a collection of knives and "was going to kill everyone," Covelli said. Police responded to the incident and seized 16 knives, a dagger, and a sword from Crimo’s possession, Covelli said. Highland Park police notified Illinois State Police of the incident but no further actions were taken.
Refusing sale is not illegal. You don’t have to sell anyone anything. It has nothing to do with infringement of constitutional rights.Just questioning your title... assuming he could pass a background check, are you saying someone should limit his constitutional right to own a firearm based on... looks? Obviously hindsight is 20/20 and whoever sold him a firearm, Obviously wouldn't, knowing what we know now... but. Just wondering what point you're trying to make.
Sent from my SM-G981V using Tapatalk
God given rights from the beginning of time, reaffirmed by the ConstitutionJust questioning your title... assuming he could pass a background check, are you saying someone should limit his constitutional right to own a firearm based on... looks? Obviously hindsight is 20/20 and whoever sold him a firearm, Obviously wouldn't, knowing what we know now... but. Just wondering what point you're trying to make.
Sent from my SM-G981V using Tapatalk