The New Classified Ad System is live. Please head here for details: https://gulfcoastgunforum.com/threads/new-classified-ad-system-tutorial.112735/
I thought Forcing someone to do things they don't want to do was determined to be equivalent to kidnapping? So wouldn't the ATF actions of fear tactics to obtain that list be similar to extortion and kidnapping?
http://aresarmor.com/store/media/cms/xmodnewsrss/ATF-cease-and-desist.pdf
Well, that explains a lot. Getting harder to feel like they were wronged.
http://aresarmor.com/store/media/cms/xmodnewsrss/ATF-cease-and-desist.pdf
Well, that explains a lot. Getting harder to feel like they were wronged.
Yep, goading them into doing something and then crying foul when they do something is pretty immature and childish. Hope they have enough funds left to continue in business when this is over because they do have good products and customer service.
Is having to pass a background check for an AR lower, finished or not, really that much of an attack on personal liberty and a slippery slope to outright bans?
look like the raid happened anyway no matter the restraining order. no FFL needed for an 80% lower.
I don't think we need anymore laws. Cartels had plenty of guns before 80% lowers became popular and background checks have already proved ineffective. If they were effective we would have people being arrested for being a felon in possession of a firearm. If a person wants a gun they can get pretty easily with or without a law about background checks.
Their problem was w the poly 80% lower color coded as to what material to remove.
Their problem was w the poly 80% lower color coded as to what material to remove.
I fully realize what you say and agree for the most part. But background checks have been around over 20 years and it seems the 80% lower thing is just a way to get around them for whatever reason one may want to legal or not. Yes criminals can and will get guns but do we have to make it so easy and efficient for them? The violence will continue but why do we need to supply the murdering thugs with their weapons?
I would not advocate new laws that further limit our ability to obtain firearms. I'm not sure I have a real problem with them cracking down on fringe situations like this which are skirting existing laws and make criminal access to mountains of functional weaponry so easy and accessible.
Since our citizens are creating the demand for the drugs that keep the cartels in business we have some sort of moral responsibility to at least try and not supply them with the weapons they murder and reak havoc with.