Bodhisattva
Marksman
China's New Export Restriction Choke Hold on Critical U.S. Ammunition Components, Are You Prepared?
China’s new export restrictions on nitrocellulose & antimony, critical for ammunition production, leave the U.S. increasingly vulnerable....
www.ammoland.com
The recent decision by China to halt the export of two critical components —nitrocellulose and antimony— has raised alarms within the U.S. ammunition manufacturing industry and among defense experts. These materials are indispensable in the production of propellant powder and primers, and their restriction threatens to create significant supply chain disruptions. As geopolitical tensions rise and global conflicts, like the war in Ukraine, drive up demand for ammunition, the U.S. faces an uncertain future in maintaining adequate ammunition supplies for both military and civilian markets.
This article explores the implications of China’s export restrictions and the broader context of critical material dependencies, with recommendations offered by AmmoLand News contributor John Farnam, a veteran of the ammunition industry, on how Americans can prepare for the coming shortages.
China’s Stranglehold on Critical Materials
China’s dominance in the production of antimony and nitrocellulose cannot be overstated. As the world’s largest producer of antimony, China accounts for nearly half of global production and supplies 63% of U.S. antimony imports. Antimony plays a vital role in the defense industry, from armor-piercing ammunition to night vision goggles and precision optics. Nitrocellulose, or “guncotton,” is essential for making propellant powder used in ammunition.In August 2024, China announced that it would discontinue the export of these materials to the United States. This decision follows a series of similar moves by China in June of 2024 to restrict the global flow of critical minerals and materials in the name of national security. For example, China imposed export controls on graphite and rare earth materials in 2023, impacting industries from semiconductors to electric vehicles. Now, the defense and ammunition sectors are bracing for the impact of these new restrictions.
In May 2024, a major nitrocellulose plant in Hubei province, China, exploded, further tightening the supply chain. Although nitrocellulose is relatively simple to produce, its hazardous nature means that only a few companies are qualified to handle its production. With China now restricting its exports of nitrocellulose, European and U.S. ammunition manufacturers are scrambling to find alternative sources.
Impact on U.S. Ammunition Supply
As China’s export restrictions take effect, U.S. ammunition manufacturers are already struggling to keep up with demand. Many companies report that their supply of components, especially propellant powder, has dwindled throughout the year, with much of the global supply being diverted to military efforts in Ukraine and domestic military stockpiles. As a result, civilian ammunition consumers are likely to experience increased shortages and higher prices.
John Farnam, an industry expert, warns that these supply chain issues will only get worse. Farnam shared insights from his connections in the ammunition business:
Farnam’s warning is clear—without access to these critical components, U.S. ammunition manufacturers will be unable to maintain production, exacerbating the existing shortage and driving up prices.
The Broader Geopolitical Context
China’s move to restrict the export of these materials comes at a time when global conflicts and military expenditures are rising. The U.S. increased military sales to foreign governments by 16% in 2023, and the war in Ukraine has placed further strain on the supply of defense materials. The United States is not alone in its reliance on Chinese imports; Europe, too, has felt the pressure. As Farnam highlighted, this situation poses a significant threat to ammunition availability, not just in the U.S. but worldwide.China’s decision to block exports is part of its broader strategy to exert influence over global supply chains. With 32% of the world’s antimony reserves, China, along with Russia, controls over half of the global supply of this critical material. Other nations with reserves, such as Bolivia and Australia, have not developed the necessary refining and production infrastructure to fill the gap. While the U.S. has invested in finding alternative sources, including partnerships with Tajikistan, these efforts are not enough to offset the immediate loss of Chinese exports.
Recommendations: What Should Consumers Do?
As the supply of ammunition becomes more constrained, Farnam offers clear advice to both ammunition manufacturers and consumers:Farnam recommends that consumers secure their ammunition, powder, and primer needs now while supplies are still somewhat available. Although some lesser-known sources of materials exist, they cannot fully replace China’s dominant role in the supply chain. Additionally, the current global geopolitical climate suggests that supply chain disruptions could last well into the foreseeable future.
For ammunition manufacturers, diversifying supply chains is a critical next step. The United States must explore alternatives from countries like Tajikistan and Australia while investing in domestic production and recycling technologies. Initiatives like the reopening of the Stibnite Gold Mine in Idaho and increased investment in recycling antimony from lead-acid batteries are steps in the right direction, but these efforts will take years to yield results.
Conclusion
China’s export restrictions on nitrocellulose and antimony present a major challenge to the U.S. ammunition supply chain. As global conflicts continue to escalate and demand for defense materials rises, the U.S. finds itself increasingly vulnerable to supply chain disruptions. While efforts to secure alternative sources of these critical materials are underway, they will not be sufficient to meet immediate demand.John Farnam’s recommendation that consumers stock up on ammunition now is timely and practical. With shortages on the horizon, securing adequate supplies is crucial to avoid future scarcity and price increases. The road ahead may be challenging, but with strategic planning and resource diversification, the U.S. can mitigate the worst effects of these disruptions.
