wildrider666
Master
I read the Steyn article an the full Brit Think Tank Guys letter. It does make perfect sense in tha absence of any other motive, insperation or mental halth issue. There is only one oversite considering they covered the all angles of the detailed prep and motive trail. I feel that his desire to leave no motive trail was more important then continuing to fire longer into the crowd. When one Security Officer got near the door (probably seen on cam/vid: he fired 40 rounds thrugh the door and adjoining walls injuring the Officer the allegedly shot himself and no further shots cam from the room. Paddock was not being shot at from within the hotel, there was no beech team near the door. In essence no direct physical threat to him existed but he shot himself (alleged) so he would not be taken alive and provide a opportunity to get a motive from him. He had to die to in order to ensure there was no motive was found.
Even if he left a note saying it was a planned largest massacre to show the evil thing that can be done with guns, it would not change the current issues being pushed. The 2A Supporters would say its a deliberate setup killing Americans to push a failed anti-gun agenda . The gun grabbers would say so what, it's still the worse gun massacre of civillians in modern times and we want to ban everything bla, bla, bla.
So the "anti-gun motive " theory really doesn't shift the current issue if true, just puts a check in the box.
Even if he left a note saying it was a planned largest massacre to show the evil thing that can be done with guns, it would not change the current issues being pushed. The 2A Supporters would say its a deliberate setup killing Americans to push a failed anti-gun agenda . The gun grabbers would say so what, it's still the worse gun massacre of civillians in modern times and we want to ban everything bla, bla, bla.
So the "anti-gun motive " theory really doesn't shift the current issue if true, just puts a check in the box.