Patriot Mobile

It don’t look good

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Gulf Coast States

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Shooter850

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Joined
    Jul 26, 2020
    Messages
    15
    Points
    3
    He lost time to move on from it. So far most of the cases he has filled have been thrown out because they lack evidence. Just because you read it on a forum or blog doesn't make it true.
     

    Ricochet

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Joined
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages
    1,271
    Points
    113
    Location
    Florida
    He lost time to move on from it. So far most of the cases he has filled have been thrown out because they lack evidence. Just because you read it on a forum or blog doesn't make it true.
    Trump didn't lose at the lower courts; they are corrupt.

    He didn't lose anything.
    He is showing up the traitors.

    And most of us who don't spoon feed at the altar of MSM doesn't just "read it on a forum" - we do research and verify facts. So don't project.
     

    Snake-Eyes

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Joined
    Jun 22, 2013
    Messages
    3,459
    Points
    113
    Location
    Florida
    He lost time to move on from it. So far most of the cases he has filled have been thrown out because they lack evidence. Just because you read it on a forum or blog doesn't make it true.

    Just because rachel madcow and the Vanderbilt fudge-packer tell you the puppet-elect "won" doesn't make it true.

    "Time to move on"?
    Hardly. There are traitors to be dealt with...
     

    Jerry

    Well Known Member
    GCGF Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Joined
    Feb 19, 2013
    Messages
    1,777
    Points
    113
    Location
    Gulf Breeze, FL
    It's going to have to be "thunder producing" (to quote a wise man) evidence and it needs to come sooner rather than later. Otherwise, it is over.
    It will need to be earth shattering and irrefutable proof to make it in front of the Supremes. Thats the only path I see and it's a long shot from my view in Gulf Breeze.
     
    Last edited:

    fl57caveman

    eclectic atavist
    GCGF Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Joined
    Jan 23, 2015
    Messages
    12,368
    Points
    113
    Location
    n.w. florida
    It's going to have to be "thunder producing" (to quote a wise man) evidence and it needs to come sooner rather than later. Otherwise, it is over.
    It will need to be earth shattering and irrefutable proof to make in in front of the Supremes. Thats the only path I see and it's a long shot from my view in Gulf Breeze.


    i know...

    damn dems are dug in like a tick in a dog's ear thinking they have this in the bag...would love to see them puke their guts up & crap their panties if this gets "biblical"
     

    FLT

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Joined
    May 15, 2017
    Messages
    3,866
    Points
    113
    Location
    Havana
    He lost time to move on from it. So far most of the cases he has filled have been thrown out because they lack evidence. Just because you read it on a forum or blog doesn't make it true.


    appears to be a liberal interpretation .
     
    Last edited:

    pcolapaddler

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Joined
    Dec 31, 2012
    Messages
    104
    Points
    28
    The evidence will have to be just that...evidence. And on a huge scale.

    Dems are dug in... We would be too if we felt that we had legitimately won an election. They are due the same consideration under law as anyone else. We may despite their politics. We may dislike them personally. The still have rights under the law.

    Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk
     

    Ricochet

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Joined
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages
    1,271
    Points
    113
    Location
    Florida
    The evidence will have to be just that...evidence. And on a huge scale.

    Dems are dug in... We would be too if we felt that we had legitimately won an election. They are due the same consideration under law as anyone else. We may despite their politics. We may dislike them personally. The still have rights under the law.

    Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk
    "Dems" don't feel they legitimately won the election.

    Criminals don't think like law abiding citizens: to liberals the end justify the means.

    They are stealing the election and they will not stop at anything - they have for 4 years called for the assassination of President Trump. Did you willfully ignore that?

    How do you think liberals operate? Liberal teachers have been sleeping with our daughters since the 70's by justifying it is "love without boundaries " and "Sexual freedom".

    Law breakers and violators do not operate on the same mindset as law abiding and just citizens.

    For example: If you imagine yourself unarmed in close proximity to another person, perhaps in one case an LEO or in another case an armed citizen, and you see they become alarmed for their safety and "brandish" a weapon but do not shoot appear only trying to defend themselves, how do you visualize responding?
    If you're a normal person your response would be to defuse, even if you were guilty of something. "Whoa!" You'd probably visibly back off.

    Does it seem surprising criminals commonly don't?

    They don't think like you. They don't fear weapons, they fear or do not fear people, and commonly they don't fear the honest citizen with gun. Simply as an example of how imagining others will think normal person can steer one wrong. Imaging the criminal is going to back off and end the threat on seeing the gun is foolish. If he does, so you don't have to fire, that was your lucky day, rather than a wise expectation.

    Imaging liberals don't want victory by massive criminal theft, because we wouldn't, would be huge error.

    They are fundamentally criminals.

    Literally thousands of them were and are involved in this theft. It was possible only because they are fundamentally criminals who do not feel or think as we do.
     
    Last edited:
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom