HD Tactical

Oops! We totally destroyed that gun.

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Gulf Coast States

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Longtooth

    Do not let us mistake necessary evils for good
    Staff member
    Super Moderator
    GCGF Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    36   0   0
    Joined
    Oct 27, 2017
    Messages
    3,446
    Points
    113
    Location
    Milton, FL

    Viper0hr

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Joined
    Apr 28, 2020
    Messages
    193
    Points
    43
    Location
    Crestview
    Hahahahaha
    Democrat Libtards lying about firearms and what they will do with them???
    NEVER!

    Glad these guns did not get destroyed, but still some BS, hopefully some kind of charge or ban for them will come from this, but I highly doubt it.
     

    FelixH

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Joined
    Oct 23, 2012
    Messages
    263
    Points
    28
    Location
    Pensacola
    Well, if they are receiving and destroying the firearms "at no charge" to the law enforcement agencies, where TF are they supposed to make money from? Are they supposed to put the guns under their pillows at night in hopes the gun destruction fairy will come and leave them a dollar?
    Sounds like a great idea, actually, if a gun must be destroyed. It doesn't cost the agency anything, and the company gets to make a few bucks on the remaining parts. I kind of wish I had thought of it.
     

    ABlaster

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Joined
    Dec 2, 2022
    Messages
    655
    Points
    93
    Location
    Tallahassee
    The receiver or the part that is the "firearm" absolutely got destroyed. What I see in the article is a bunch of hand-wringing because even though they explain it a bit, they are counting on their readers not knowing what legally constitutes a firearm.
     
    Top Bottom